TV MEDIA REPORTS


See the TV News Reports at the top of the Sidebar below to the right, just below this links section....and click on the photos!

LEGAL CASES

  • John Fox & Clemon Williams vs. Kern High School District, Whistleblowing to the FBI Re: Garland Purchase Orders, Bakersfield, California, 2013
  • GSA vs. Tremco, Qui Tam Suit, 2013
  • Los Angeles vs. Garland, Re: Bid Collusion, Racketeering, etc., Los Angeles, California, About 1997
  • Quality Tile Roofing vs. Tremco Roofing, Re: False Fraud Charges leveled at Tremco Certified Contractor for not bidding Tremco products at Mountain Home Air Force Base, Boise, Idaho, About 1997

Tuesday, June 25, 2013

Garland Named by Tea Party Activist at Televised School Board Hearing - in the largest California High School District



Bill Lind, the head of the local Tea Party in Bakersfield, California has named Garland in a televised School Board Hearing last night as being involved with their local high school district's personnel in corruption - and the school board covering up - for over 10 years.

To their faces.

The Kern High School District is the largest in California, with 18 high schools and other schools.

The Garland Roofing Purchase Orders in the amount of $200,000 per year with broken-up roofing construction contracts in the tens of thousands at a time going to Commercial Roofing - all of them - for over 10 years was the focus of Bill Linds' remarks.

A previous post on this blog from July, 2010 details those broken-up contracts.

Bill Lind showed a report from a staff accountant, John Cronen, detailing the Garland purchase orders.

New Story on air - naming Garland:
http://www.bakersfieldnow.com/news/local/Tea-party-member-accuses-Kern-High-School-District-of-corruption-212869701.html?tab=video&c=y

New Story in print - naming Garland: 
http://www.bakersfieldcalifornian.com/local/grade/x607077386/Tea-party-activist-criticizes-KHSD-board

Original Story on Air:
http://www.kget.com/news/local/story/Retirees-suing-KHSD-are-honored-by-trustees/PX4rHjOe502Ffc533Nwp3w.cspx

UPDATE, Tuesday, June 25, 2013:


A protest was held this date outside of the Kern High School District by the NAACP.  The televised version is here:

http://www.bakersfieldnow.com/news/local/Protesters-alleged-Kern-High-School-District-corruption-213008961.html?tab=video&c=y

Oklahoma Enacts Legislation Addressing Gratuities for Sole-Sourced


Oklahoma has just instituted a new law - Enrolled Senate Bill No. 630 - aimed at but missing the bulls' eye of the heart of the roofing scams targeting schools and other public construction works dollars.

I was contacted several weeks ago just after its' passage, and sent a copy.  I have posted it below.

However, I was just as dismayed in reading it as I was the debacle passed in the California Legislature - after more than 13 years' work at that point to expose the scam.

The new Oklahoma law targets contractors as the source of bribes in the scam, when they are not the source and method of how the scam operates.


We believe and have heard repeatedly the same story in two countries - that particular  manufacturers train their reps to get in way ahead of any planning to budgetary "decision makers" - practicing architecture and engineering without a license in most cases.  We even have posted their in-house training documents that show how they do so.

Tremco and Garland's own in-house documents state precisely how they do it, minus the kickbacks involved.

But the new law does not require product manufacturers whose products are part of the winning bid, local officials such as School Boards or City Councils, or school administrators and other personnel to certify they had no involvement with gifts of any kind for bid awards.  
The Law should have primarily - primarily - required manufacturers whose products are part of the winning bid sign the same document.  

The document should require all and any Manufacturer's Managers and Reps in the area who were involved with the School Boards, Purchasing Organizations, City Councils, Superintendents, School Administrators and staff and Facilities Directors and staff to sign the same document as required of contractors.

The Law should have also required all decision makers - every School Board Member, Purchasing Agency Directors on down, City Council members, Superintendents, School Administrators and staff, and Facilities Directors and staff - to sign the same document.

And there is no mention of those supposedly writing (or copying) manufacturer's very own restrictive proprietary performance specifications being required to certify they did not receive gratuities to sole-source products.

Here is a copy of the new Oklahoma Governor's signed Bill, copied in below.
____________________________________________

AN ACT



ENROLLED SENATE
BILL NO. 630                       By: Jolley of the Senate

                                               and

                                        Murphey of the House





An Act relating to sole source purchase contracts; amending 74 O.S. 2011, Section 85.22, which relates to competitive bidding; modifying certification requirements; authorizing substitution of certain products; prohibiting purchasing restrictions to certain geographical areas; authorizing promulgation of rules to implement act; providing for codification; providing for noncodification; and declaring an emergency.





SUBJECT:  Competitive bidding procedures

BE IT ENACTED BY THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA:

SECTION 1.     AMENDATORY     74 O.S. 2011, Section 85.22, is amended to read as follows:

Section 85.22.  Any competitive bid submitted to the State of Oklahoma or contract executed by the state for goods or services in excess of Five Thousand Dollars ($5,000.00) shall contain a certification, which shall be in substantially the following form:

A.  For purposes of competitive bids, I certify:

1.  I am the duly authorized agent of _____________, the bidder submitting the competitive bid which is attached to this statement, for the purpose of certifying the facts pertaining to the existence of collusion among bidders and between bidders and state officials or employees, as well as facts pertaining to the giving or offering of things of value to government personnel in return for special consideration in the letting of any contract pursuant to the bid to which this statement is attached;

2.  I am fully aware of the facts and circumstances surrounding the making of the bid to which this statement is attached and have been personally and directly involved in the proceedings leading to the submission of such bid; and

3.  Neither the bidder nor anyone subject to the bidder's direction or control has been a party:

a.   to any collusion among bidders in restraint of freedom of competition by agreement to bid at a fixed price or to refrain from bidding,

b.   to any collusion with any state official or employee as to quantity, quality or price in the prospective contract, or as to any other terms of such prospective contract, nor

c.   in any discussions between bidders and any state official concerning exchange of money or other thing of value for special consideration in the letting of a contract, nor

d.   to any efforts or offers with state agency or political subdivision officials or others to create a sole brand acquisition or a sole source acquisition in contradiction to Section 2 of this act.

B.  I certify, if awarded the contract, whether competitively bid or not, neither the contractor nor anyone subject to the contractor’s direction or control has paid, given or donated or agreed to pay, give or donate to any officer or employee of the State of Oklahoma any money or other thing of value, either directly or indirectly, in procuring the contract to which this statement is attached.

Certified this _______ day of_________________ 20__.

SECTION 2.     NEW LAW     A new section of law to be codified in the Oklahoma Statutes as Section 85.45j.1 of Title 74, unless there is created a duplication in numbering, reads as follows:

A.  Notwithstanding any other provision of law or agency rule to the contrary, any bid submissions received by a state agency or any political subdivision pursuant to authorized sole source bidding procedures established by the provisions of Section 85.45j of Title 74 of the Oklahoma Statutes, which substitute an item with one that is alike in quality and design or which meets the required specifications of the bid shall be considered and shall not be prohibited.  In terms of public construction contracts, with exception of specific products submitted and approved prior to release for bidding by the Oklahoma Attorney General for matching preexisting materials, at least three equivalent items from more than one manufacturer and more than one supplier or representative shall be included in the required specifications.

B.  In addition, no sole source bid proposal shall require any limitation that materials must be supplied from a vendor within any specific geographical area.  Geographic preference for vendors inside the geographical boundaries may be given, but only when the cost is the same or less.

SECTION 3.     NEW LAW     A new section of law not to be codified in the Oklahoma Statutes reads as follows:

The Office of Management and Enterprise Services is authorized to promulgate rules as necessary to implement the provisions of this act.

SECTION 4.  It being immediately necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health and safety, an emergency is hereby declared to exist, by reason whereof this act shall take effect and be in full force from and after its passage and approval."

Passed the Senate the 30th day of April, 2013.


                             
                                 Presiding Officer of the Senate


Passed the House of Representatives the 17th day of April, 2013.


                            
                                  Presiding Officer of the House
                                              of Representatives

OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR
Received by the Office of the Governor this ____________________ day of ___________________, 20_______, at _______ o'clock _______ M.
By: _________________________________
Approved by the Governor of the State of Oklahoma this _________ day of ___________________, 20_______, at _______ o'clock _______ M.

                                _________________________________
                                Governor of the State of Oklahoma


OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF STATE
Received by the Office of the Secretary of State this __________ day of __________________, 20 _______, at _______ o'clock _______ M.
By: _________________________________